I hate electoral fraud, not just because it undermines democracy, but because it insults the memory of those who have fought and died for the right to vote.
When I first came to this country, almost all voting took place on polling day, in privacy and in the polling booth. Registration was determined by where you lived on a particular date – 10th October – and though that was overly restrictive, it had the benefit of not allowing people to ‘multi-register’. Voters needed proof of illness (or a need to travel) to obtain a postal vote, the police guarded the polling booths and it was unheard of for anyone to ‘assist’ someone to make their cross on a ballot paper. The only exception would be if someone was severely disabled and needed physical assistance, in which case it would be provided by a council official, observed by colleagues. These council officials strictly enforced rules preventing candidates or their supporters from harassing, or even approaching, people on the way in to the polling station. Even large posters could be removed.
Since then, the Electoral Commission’s obsession with widening the register and making it easier to vote, especially by post, has made the system wide open to abuse. Many regulations have been swept away while others are simply not enforced. It has made it far easier to ‘personate’ individuals; to pressurise people into voting in a particular way; and to commandeer or steal postal voting papers.
Over the past few years, evidence of fraud has been mounting. The Tower Hamlets case is only the most recent.
I’ve seen nothing to convince me that former Mayor of Tower Hamlets Lutfur Rahman is any thing other than what Judge Richard Mawrey QC, the Election Commissioner, said he was, a corrupt, ambitious man who blatantly broke electoral law for his own interests, using a section of the local community to do it. If he appeals and presents evidence that the original allegations were wrong, I’ll be the first to acknowledge it, but I don’t think for a moment that will happen. I hope the police will finally act on the information they have held for so long.
I would suggest that the four individuals who put their careers and finances on the line by bringing the case against Rahman, whatever their politics, have in them far more of the Poplar Council spirit, than Rahman and his cohorts. It must have taken real courage to persevere in the face of allegations of racism and islamophobia. There has been a cowardly conspiracy of silence around electoral fraud and a shameful lack of action by most politicians, the police and Crown Prosecution Service. It needs to stop.
I hope that Parliament will:
- return to the system of registering people according to where they live on a particular date
- prosecute fraudulent registration and other breaches of electoral law
- stop postal voting on demand and actively encourage people (especially women) to attend the polling station
- stop the mobbing of polling station entrances
- stop interference with voting inside polling stations, including by family members,
- require voters to produce ID when receiving a ballot paper.
Tighter regulation in Northern Ireland has gone a long way to making elections fairer. Similar changes in Britain are long overdue.
Jean Calder, electoral fraud, personation, postal voting, Electoral Commission, Election Commissioner, Poplar Council, Judge Richard Mawrey, mobbing of polling stations, Lutfur Rahman, Tower Hamlets
Filed under: Politics, UK Politics | Tagged: Election Commissioner, Electoral Commission, electoral fraud, Jean Calder, Judge Richard Mawrey, Lutfur Rahman, mobbing of polling stations, personation, Poplar Council, postal voting, Tower Hamlets | 3 Comments »